![]() Vola objected to these interrogatories to the extent they require Vola to marshal its evidence or seek information protected by the work product privilege. ![]() Vola was capable of fulfilling all purchase orders as submitted by any defendant for the 2016 soccer season.Excess uniforms ordered by any defendant made the basis of the lawsuit could not be sold to a third party due to customization.Sting Soccer was obligated to purchase any excess supply of uniforms from Vola for the 2016 soccer season as alleged in paragraph 21 of Vola's first amended petition.Interrogatory numbers 7, 8, and 9 requested Vola to identify facts of which Vola is specifically aware that Vola contends establishes, demonstrates or proves the following contentions: Sting Soccer complains of the trial court's denial of Sting Soccer's motion to compel responses to interrogatory numbers 7, 8, 9, and 14, and the trial court's sustaining of Vola's objections to those interrogatories. ![]() ![]() The trial court sustained many of Vola's objections. Vola objected to a substantial portion of the discovery requests, and relators filed a motion to compel and motion to determine the sufficiency of those objections. Sting Soccer and Coralli, as well as other defendants who have since been non-suited, each served Vola with interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admissions. Vola also brought a breach of fiduciary duty claim against Coralli. Vola sued Coralli, Sting Soccer, and others for breach of contract and declaratory judgment. Sting Soccer notified Vola that it was terminating the exclusively agreement due to Vola's failure to perform in relation to the 2016 uniforms. Sting Soccer requested new custom-designed uniforms for the 2016 season, and Vola proposed that Sting Soccer instead purchase from the excess supply of uniforms from the prior season. A dispute arose between Sting Soccer and Vola regarding uniforms for the 2016 season. Coralli entered into multiple purchase orders with Vola, which resulted in an excess supply of custom uniforms for Sting Soccer. In 2014, Sting Soccer Club, all its entities and subsidiaries, and Vola entered into a contract for Vola to be Sting Soccer Club's exclusive provider of uniforms. Vola was created for the specific purpose of being the exclusive provider of sports apparel to Sting Soccer Club. In 2014, Vola was sold and a new entity created using the same name. Coralli was instrumental in founding Vola in 2007. Real party in interest Vola, LLC ("Vola") is a sports apparel brand that specializes in team uniforms, active wear, and footwear. Relator Brent Lee Coralli ("Coralli") is the president of Sting Soccer Club, which is a female soccer club, and of relator Sting Soccer Group, L.P. We conditionally grant the writ as to the requests for production and interrogatories and deny the writ as to the requests for admissions. Relators complain that the trial court sustained the real party in interest's objections to multiple requests for production, requests for admissions, and interrogatories. This original proceeding involves a discovery dispute in a contract action involving soccer uniforms. 429-01689-2016 MEMORANDUM OPINIONÄ«efore Justices Lang, Evans, and Stoddart Original Proceeding from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |